Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
For comments and suggestions email
Diversified Insurance Brokers Webmaster
©2006 Diversified Insurance Brokers

Bailout vs. Other Government Programs   July 2nd, 2009
Posted by Kevin in 21st Century Business, Blogs, Business, Government Policy, Risk Management | Add a comment »

Wow! — I know this information has been out for a bit but I just caught this summary from BoingBoing

Relative sizes are to scale.
Bailout vs. Other Government Programs
• Marshall Plan: Cost: $12.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $115.3 billion
• Louisiana Purchase: Cost: $15 million, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $217 billion
• Race to the Moon: Cost: $36.4 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $237 billion
• S&L Crisis: Cost: $153 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $256 billion
• Korean War: Cost: $54 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $454 billion
• The New Deal: Cost: $32 billion (Est), Inflation Adjusted Cost: $500 billion (Est)
• Invasion of Iraq: Cost: $551b, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $597 billion
• Vietnam War: Cost: $111 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $698 billion
• NASA: Cost: $416.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $851.2 billion

TOTAL: $3.92 trillion
figures from BOING-BOING


Peace of Mind or Economic Advantage?   June 25th, 2009
Posted by Kevin in Books, Business, Insurance Carrier, Risk Management | Add a comment »

Peace of Mind or Economic Advantage?Modern insurance is a financial product that was developed overseas rather than in the United States. Many insurance contract legal principals were also first developed by English Courts.

So, why do you buy an insurance policy? Sometimes, it is required by a mortgage or a loan. Often, you buy insurances because you view the risk of devastation by a catastrophe to be far worse than “hedging” against this situation by paying a small premium. I think most of us buy insurance for the peace of mind in knowing we will be able to recover should a catastrophe occur. In my own experience, I switched insurance companies because I was very unsatisfied with the approach taken by my previous insurance company in paying out a claim. At the end of the day, I don’t think that my current insurance company, Allied, would have paid more than my previous company, Phoenix Indemnity. The problem was that I had to fight Phoenix Indemnity for every penny paid whereas Allied feels like a partner that is working to help me, not hose me.

Emotional distress damages and consequential damages beyond the insurance policy are often granted to policyholders because the insurance industry contemplates the consequences of wrongfully performing its obligations. Every insurance adjuster knows that the purpose of buying the insurance is defeated if the underwriter wrongfully underpays a claim or fails to pay at all.

Peace of mind is one of the most basic attributes of an insurance product, even though it is never mentioned in the policy. Policyholders intuitively know that this peace of mind is a large part of the bargained-for-exchange. The emotional toll caused by an insurer’s unjust claim delay and denial is lost peace of mind.

Malcolm Clarke, a professor of Commercial Contract Law at Cambridge has written a worthy read for an insurance law book, Policies and Perceptions of Insurance Law in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford Univ. Press 2007). His explanations of insurance are very helpful to consumers of insurance.

Professor Clarke addressed the reason why consumers purchase insurance in the context of risk, risk aversion, stress aversion, and peace of mind:

“To ordinary policyholders, who may well not be models of behavior or rationality, something is risky if loss is relatively likely to happen, or, although it is not likely to happen, if the effect will be disastrous if it does….Policyholders are less concerned with the precise probability than with whether the risk seems probable or bad enough to justify paying (premium) to soften its effect; that depends on their view of things, i.e., what psychologists call risk aversion.

Risk Aversion

In the words of The Economist, risk aversion is the feature of human nature that explains why, ‘when given a choice between, say, losing 1 dollar and a 10 per cent chance of losing 10 dollars, most people would prefer a certain outcome (losing 1 dollar) to a risky one (losing 10 dollars or nothing)’. ‘Prospect theory tells us that people making decisions in uncertain conditions weigh prospective loss twice as heavily as prospective gains. If people know that there is a 1 per cent chance of total loss of their £100,000 house, they may be willing to pay more than £1,000 for insurance, and one of the main reasons is that they are willing to pay to offload anxiety. Such people are ‘risk averse’. The Association of British Insurers (ABI), the organization that speaks for the insurance industry, projects insurance as something that enables people who are insured to organize their household budgets, or plan their business activities, with greater certainty…This raises the question: What is it that makes a risk so unacceptable that people decide to do something about it and, in particular, to buy insurance cover?

Stress Aversion and the Purchase of Peace of Mind

Risk aversion grows from stress aversion. One of the causes of stress in human Beings–in the motor car, the work place, or anywhere else–is a sense of not being in control of their situation, or of themselves. For many of those who avoid flying, the reason is not only fear of an air crash but also fear of losing control of themselves, as a result of stress. Research also shows that, in a given risk situation on the roads, the anxiety levels among passengers are higher than among drivers. Drivers feel in control; passengers do not…

One of the ways in which people seek to regain control of their lives, to reduce stress and to move towards some kind of peace of mind, is by taking out insurance. That is why some insurers send their sales staff on courses to learn about the ‘emotional needs’ of the customer. That is also why some insurers advertise life insurance for ‘life-long peace of mind’ and travel cover ‘to give you peace of mind when travelling’ . A major bank has offered ‘a free home insurance review to ensure peace of mind’. Insurers also point to peace of mind when underlining that the cheapest insurance is not always the best insurance. Advertising of this kind has an enduring appeal, and even the courts have recognized this–in other countries.

Associated with the wish for peace and certainty is a desire for security. Sociologists tell us that on a descending scale of priorities, just after people’s basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter, comes the need for security. Insurers know this too, and security is another prominent feature of the image that insurers project of their products to the insured.

…An important feature of insurance contracts is that a significant part of what policyholders are paying for is peace of mind.”


Can Twitter Really Change the Way We Live?   June 22nd, 2009
Posted by Kevin in 21st Century Business, Risk Management, Social Media, Technology Issues | Add a comment »

TwitterI read an interesting article last week about Twitter from Time Magazine. It is still a little hard for me to see the significance of Twitter and what it can do for a business, but this piece from Time magazine did a good job in showing how Twitter can be influential in some very interesting ways.

Feel free to follow me on Twitter, though I am only somewhat active. As Twitter (and I) evolves, I may become much more active. Time will tell.


2009 Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Results   June 15th, 2009
Posted by Kevin in AIG, Risk Management | Add a comment »

On Friday night, the wait was over for the finalists of the 2009 Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year contest for Utah and southern Idaho. Awards were given in a total of eight categories. Over 1,200 people attended the black-tie event at the Salt Palace Convention Center.

Utah Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert, the keynote speaker, noted that small businesses fuel the state’s economy, with about 57,000 “small employers” representing 97 percent of the state’s employers.

Utah’s economy favors free markets, which is why a handful of national business publications have rated Utah’s economy as No. 1.

“I fear, at least in some ways, (the importance of free markets is) being forgotten in Washington, just a little bit,” Herbert said as the audience applauded in agreement. “Capitalism is becoming a dirty word. I’m here to tell you that’s not going to happen in Utah.”

New this year in the awards competition was a social-entrepreneur category, described as being for well-managed organizations that solve problems in the community with strong leadership. Matt Minkevitch of The Road Home received the award.

Minkevitch said The Road Home’s clientele are people who live in the margins and have one setback that ruins them financially. They end up homeless.

“One of the significant transitions that has taken place over the last eight years is we’ve focused on the other end of homelessness,” he said, “to help people move into housing.”

The Utah award recipients will next compete against other companies for national awards. Diversified Insruance Group was one of the sponsors of the awards.

Award recipients in the Utah competition were:

Technology: Matthew Heaton — BlueHost

Retail and Consumer Products: Jonathan Freedman, William Freedman and Charles Freedman ?— DownEast Outfitters

Emerging: David Flynn and Rick White — Fusion-io

Contract services: Douglas Sayer — Premier Technology Inc.

E-Commerce: Ryan DeLuca — Bodybuilding.com LLC

Social Entrepreneur: Matt Minkevitch — The Road Home

Services: Andrea Anaya — Career Step

Distribution and Manufacturing: Dallin Larsen — MonaVie

Diversified extends congratulations to all of the finalists and award recipients.